January 26, 2018
Speaker of the House Paul D. Ryan
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Mr. Speaker,
On behalf of the undersigned organizations and our millions of members, we appreciate your leadership in bringing the debate over earmarks into the open after the attempt to modify the earmark moratorium in the Republican Conference on November 16, 2016.
Following that meeting, you were quoted by sources in the room that you wanted a “more thorough process to look at this issue” and that it was not appropriate to reinstitute earmarks in a secret-ballot process.
We agree that any modification of the earmark moratorium or any legislation related to earmarks must be done through a recorded, public vote, and urge you to reiterate your commitment to this process.
Earmarks are corrupt, inequitable, and wasteful. They circumvent the authorization and appropriations process. The history of earmarks is not apparent to the more than 60 percent of House Republicans who were elected following the establishment of the moratorium in 2011. While these members may be tempted by the promise of earmarks, they should be aware that at best they might get a few morsels of pork. In the 111th Congress, 81 appropriators (50 in the House and 31 in the Senate), who constituted 15 percent of the entire Congress, purloined 51 percent of the earmarks and 61 percent of the money.
We understand that if a vote for the return of earmarks takes place outside of the legislative process, it could be behind closed doors in a Republican Conference meeting, or possibly at the Republican retreat on January 31-February 2. Those who call for reviving earmarks claim that they will be more transparent and accountable than in the past. If that is the case, a secret vote gives little confidence to taxpayers that a new earmark regime would be above board.
We do not support a restoration of earmarks in any way and continue to advocate for a permanent earmark ban. But, if a vote to restore earmarks were to take place, we respectfully urge you to ensure that the vote tally is made public, so that the American people can know who decided to bring back bridges to nowhere, indoor rainforests, and teapot museums.
Sincerely,
Tom Schatz, President, Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
Adam Brandon, President, FreedomWorks
Pete Sepp, President, National Taxpayers Union
Grover Norquist, President, Americans for Tax Reform
David McIntosh, President, Club for Growth
Senator Jim DeMint
Edward Corrigan, Former Executive Director of the Senate Steering Committee
David Williams, President, Taxpayers Protection Alliance
Carrie Lukas, President, Independent Women’s Forum
Heather R. Higgins, President and CEO, Independent Women’s Voice
Michael A. Needham, CEO, Heritage Action for America
Andrew Quinlan, President, Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Jonathan Bydlak, President, Coalition to Reduce Spending
Ryan Alexander, President, Taxpayers for Common Sense
Lisa B. Nelson, CEO, ALEC Action
Jim Martin, Founder and Chairman, 60 Plus Association
Olivia Grady, Senior Fellow, Center for Worker Freedom
Phil Kerpen, President, American Commitment
George Landrith, President, Frontiers of Freedom
Jenny Beth Martin, Chairman, Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund
Victor Riches, President and CEO, Goldwater Institute
The post Conservative Coalition Demands Transparency in Earmark Debate appeared first on Club for Growth.